Paper 3 Question B
Raina is five years old and is in the post-telegraphic stage of development. In this stage, children tend to learn various new words from the people around them and use them in more complex ways. According to Michael Halliday’s functions of language, Raina is using heuristic language since her mother is helping her experience the world via the countryside. Her mother is teaching her words that associate with their surrounding environment such as “butterfly,” “spider,” and “blackbird.”
Her mother also tends to simplify these words to make it easier for Raina to understand. She refers to birds as “birdies,” calls insects “creepy crawlies,” and shortens a sentence to “too long grass.” By using the Language Acquisition Support System (LASS), these words become much easier for Raina to learn. Since her mother is pointing out the objects or animals being referenced, Raina will be able to associate them with the word being used.
Also, her mother heavily uses caretaker language throughout their conversation. For example, she promotes turn-taking by asking questions like “see the butterfly” and eliciting the response “where” from her daughter. Turn-taking is significant when it comes to conversations as it helps propel them. This prevents them from being one-sided or monologue-like. In addition, this ties to the adjacency pair format of a question followed by a response. After one subject speaks, the other responds and this process is continued. Raina also back-channels when she replies with “mm hmm.” She uses this as a way to show her mother she is engaged in their conversation without having to speak a verbal response.
Raina’s mother continuously uses upward intonation. She ends her questions, “see the butterfly” and “see it in the long grass,” with a higher pitch as it draws and directs Raina’s attention. Although this is commonly referred to as baby talk, she uses it as a way to keep Raina interested.
Furthermore, Raina’s mother repeats phrases such as “if you if you be quiet, you’ll hear them (1) LOOK (1) do you hear them” which adds emphasis to the word “hear.” Repetition is commonly used to help another grasp the concept.
Throughout the transcription, both Raina and her mother use words like ‘this,” “there,” and “that,” which to the reader, gives no reference. However, this deixis is clearly understood by both characters.
Also, since this conversation is an unscripted discourse, the discussion is thought up on the spot and may not flow as smoothly. This increases the risk for mistakes when speaking to be made. For instance, Raina’s mother precedes by saying, “I think theres nests in that in those trees.” She quickly corrected herself since she realized there were multiple nests in multiple trees. Later on, Raina uses a false start when stumbling over her words and questioned, “YES (.) a I (1) he can’t fly can he.” As seen here both subjects try to fix their mistakes by rewording what they were saying.
Next, both Raina and her mother continue to use contractions throughout their conversations like ““youve,” “theres,” “i’m.” Contractions tend to be used in informal dialogue between people who are comfortable with each other as seen here.
Since Raina is so comfortable with her mother, she uses demanding phrases to tell her what to do. She says, “let’s go this way” and “i want to go this way” which falls under Michael Halliday’s regulatory function of language. Raina uses declarative words in hopes of influencing her mother’s actions. After doing so, Raina’s mother uses the discourse marker “well” to mean “in that case.” Typically discourse markers are used to change topics or connect topics. Here, the use of “well” acts as a way to bound both Raina’s and her mother’s comments.
AO1:You had a detailed understanding of the text and your analysis was quite detailed. You also had effective references to characteristic features.
ReplyDeleteAO4:You had a sophisticated understanding of the linguistic issues, concepts, methods, and approaches through your analysis and references. You also had effective references to the linguistic methods used.
AO5:You had a detailed selection, analysis and synthesis of language data. You did well by having lots of quotes and also kept them detailed.
19/25
AO1: ⅘ marks
ReplyDeleteYou show a detailed understanding of the context in the transcript as you mention certain parts of context throughout your explanations. In each paragraph, you mention a new characteristic feature. For instance, when you talk about intonation you use short quotes and explain in a detailed manner. However, your characteristics could be more insightful with a little more explanation. For instance, when you talk about the informal dialogue where people are comfortable with each other you could specifically describe the relationship between a caretaker and a child.
AO4: 12/15 marks
You show a detailed understanding of linguistic issue and concepts as you use buzzwords and theories. Such as “LASS” and “turn-taking” which you then support with a quote and explanation further showing your understanding to the reader. Your explanations are effective because you name specific theorists and define their definitions of the theories they created. However, there are some parts of your analysis that need further explanation. For example, when you say, ‘this deixis is clearly understood by both characters.’ How is this understood by both characters? Quote or explain how in the conversation this is told.
AO5: 5/5 marks
There is not much needed to say in this category except that you did a very good job quoting and explaining many different language data in your analysis.
21/25
AO1: 5 AO4: 13 AO5: 5
ReplyDeleteI thought your analysis was spot on. I thought you gave similar amounts of analysis to both Raina and the mother, which was excellent and on topic. I learned new ideas to talk about from your blog in relation to child language acquisition, like “deixis” and repetition. This is excellent and shows a deep understanding of the concepts. Your analysis was very comprehensive, so I only have recommendations to add to your analysis to make it even stronger. For instance, you could also include the buzzword “caretaker language” into your analysis when you discuss LASS. This is because your citations like “birdie” fall under this category. Additionally, you could insert the buzzword “imperative” when you discuss the “demanding phrases” that Raina uses when instructing her mother. I thought that your writing was very insightful and did not need any improvements. These few suggestions could be utilized as a couple more talking points in the future to gain more points. I thought you did an excellent job, and your analysis was very cohesive.
Hello,
ReplyDeleteI think this blog was pretty good. I think that you had done a very good job of analyzing the conversation. I do however think that you had focused on the mother a lot more than the child as you had written three paragraphs about her mothers language then mentioned Raina's briefly then had started talking about her mothers language again. I think that you could have written a little more about Raina's child acquisition instead of focusing on her mothers language. I think that a few of those paragraphs were needed however as they had made perfect sense for the mother to be speaking to Raina in this way. For AO1 i think that you had shown a clear understanding of the text and its characteristic features so i would give you 3 marks. For AO4 i think that you had shown a detailed understanding on the child acquisition and had an effective reference to outside references. For AO4 I would give you 10 marks. For AO5 I think that you have shown a detailed analysis of language data. AO5 would give you 4 marks. Overall that is 17 marks out of 25. Great job!